Accessibility disclaimer: To obtain information contained in document files on this page in an accessible format please contact the IU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) at (317) 274-8289 or via email at irb@iu.edu
HRPP Policy - Emergency use
About This Policy
- Effective date:
- 07/19/2018
- Last updated:
- 01/19/2021
- Policy Contact:
IU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
(317) 274-8289
irb@iu.edu
1.0 - Scope
This policy applies to the use of a non-FDA approved or non-FDA cleared test article by a clinician at an Indiana University or IU-affiliated healthcare facility for which the IU Institutional Review Board (IRB) generally provides oversight when all of the following are true:
- The potential patient is in a life-threatening situation.
- No standard acceptable treatment is available.
- There is not sufficient time to obtain IRB approval.
This policy does not apply to off-label use of an FDA-approved test article.
Back to top2.0 - Policy Statement
A clinician may use a test article without prospective IRB review and approval if the following conditions apply:
- The potential patient is in a life-threatening situation.
- No standard acceptable treatment is available.
- There is not sufficient time to obtain IRB approval.
The emergency use of a test article, other than a medical device, is not considered to be human subjects research but is a clinical investigation; the patient is a participant; and the FDA may require data from an emergency use to be reported in a marketing application.
Any subsequent use of the test article at the institution is subject to IRB review.
The clinician must obtain prospective, written informed consent from the patient or the patient's legally authorized representative (LAR) in accordance with IU HRPP Policy on Informed Consent.
An exception to the informed consent requirement may apply if both the treating clinician and a physician who is not otherwise associated with the use of the test article certify in writing all of the following:
- The patient is confronted by a life-threatening situation necessitating the use of the test article.
- Informed consent cannot be obtained because of an inability to communicate with or obtain legally effective consent from the patient.
- Time is not sufficient to obtain consent from the patient's LAR.
- No alternative method of approved or generally recognized therapy is available that provides equal or greater likelihood of saving the life of the patient.
If, in the clinician's opinion, immediate use of the test article is required to preserve the life of the patient and time is not sufficient to obtain the independent determination regarding exception to the informed consent requirement in advance, the determination shall be made by the clinician and, within five (5) business days after the use of the article, be reviewed and evaluated in writing by a physician who is not participating in the use of the test article.
During regular business hours, the clinician must contact the IU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) and consult with staff regarding whether an existing IRB-approved protocol would allow use of the test article, whether an Investigational New Drug application (IND) or Investigational Device Exemption application (IDE) from the FDA is needed, and whether the situation allows for sufficient time to obtain IRB approval.
Outside of regular business hours, or if IU HRPP is not available, the clinician may use the test article under this policy, carefully documenting the following:
- The conditions for emergency use specified in 2.0 are met.
- Consent was obtained and documented in accordance with the IU HRPP Policy on Informed Consent, unless the exception from informed consent requirements described in 2.1 above applies.
Use of a test article under this policy must be reported to the IRB within five (5) business days. The clinician must submit notification via a Kuali Protocols Emergency Use submission and provide the following information:
- A full description of the situation, including justification for the emergency use;
- A full description of the test article, including the trade name, generic name, chemical name, and/or device name, the IND or IDE number, and name of sponsor/manufacturer;
- A full description of the procedure(s) employed; and
- A description of the consent process used, including an unsigned copy of the informed consent document.
When the HRPP receives notification of an emergency use that has taken place, an IU HRPP Assistant or Associate Director or the University Director, HRPP, review the report to determine if the use complied with FDA and institutional requirements. If requirements were met, an acknowledgement letter is sent to the clinician. If it is determined that requirements were not met, the matter is handled according to the noncompliance procedures delineated in the IU HRPP Policy on Reportable Events.
Use of the exception from informed consent requirements described in 2.1 above must be reported to the IRB within five (5) business days. The clinician must submit notification via Kuali Protocols and provide the documentation from both the clinician and the physician who is not participating in the clinical investigation.
4.0 - Sanctions
Individuals found to be in violation of this policy may be subject to sanctions relating to their participation in research with human subjects, up to and including permanent suspension or debarment from engaging in research with human subjects at Indiana University.
Back to top5.0 - History
HSO replaced with HRPP throughout. KC IRB replaced with Kuali Protocols throughout. Removed reference to KC IRB in section 6.0.
Back to topRegulatory References
- AAHRPP Standards
- Element I.7.C
- 21 CFR 50.23(a)
- 21 CFR 56, especially 56.102(d), 56.104(c)
- 45 CFR 46.116(j)
- FDA Guidance: Emergency Use of an Investigational Drug or Biologic-Information Sheet
7.0 - Definitions related to this policy
clinical investigation, device, drug, informed consent, institutional review board (IRB), investigational biologic/drug/device/test article, investigational device exemption, investigational new drug application, IRB-approved protocol, legally authorized representative (LAR), life-threatening, noncompliance, sponsor, test article, written/in writing
View All Abbreviations and Definitions
Back to top