Accessibility disclaimer: To obtain information contained in document files on this page in an accessible format please contact the IU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) at (317) 274-8289 or via email at irb@iu.edu
HRPP Policy - IRB Membership
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Membership
About This Policy
- Effective date:
- 03/29/2018
- Last updated:
- 01/19/2021
- Policy Contact:
IU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
(317) 274-8289
irb@iu.edu
1.0 - Scope
This policy applies to all Indiana University Institutional Review Boards (IRBs).
Back to topMembers are appointed to the IU IRBs to ensure the following requirements are met:
- Each IRB has at least five members with varying backgrounds to promote complete and adequate review of research activities commonly conducted by IU and its affiliates.
- Each IRB is sufficiently qualified, through the experience and expertise (professional competence), and diversity of its members, including race, gender, and cultural backgrounds and sensitivity to such issues as community attitudes, to promote respect for its advice and counsel in safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects.
- Each IRB is able to ascertain the acceptability of proposed research in terms of institutional commitments and regulations (including policies and resources), applicable local, state, and federal requirements, and standards of professional conduct and practice.
- If an IRB regularly reviews research that involves a category of subjects that is vulnerable to coercion or undue influence, such as children, prisoners, adult individuals lacking consent capacity, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons, consideration is given to the inclusion of one or more individuals who are knowledgeable about and experienced in working with these categories of subjects. IRBs reviewing VA research should also consider including a veteran or veteran's representative.
- No IRB consists entirely of members of one profession.
- Each IRB includes at least one member whose primary concerns are in scientific areas and at least one member whose primary concerns are unambiguously in nonscientific areas (i.e., little or no scientific or medical training or experience).
- Each IRB includes at least one member who is not otherwise affiliated with the institution and who is not part of the immediate family of a person who is affiliated with the institution.
- Each IRB includes at least one member who represents the perspective of research subjects.
- Each IRB that regularly reviews research involving prisoners:
- includes a majority of members that have no association with the prison(s) involved, apart from their membership on the IRB
- has at least one voting member who is a prisoner or prisoner representative with a close working knowledge, understanding, and appreciation of prison conditions from the perspective of a prisoner
The following may not serve as voting members of the IRB:
- Individuals responsible for business development for IU and its affiliates
- Individuals who own equity in the institution
- VA facility research staff including, but not limited to, the Associated Chief of Staff for Research & Development (R&D) and the Administrative Officer for R&D
- VA Research Compliance Officers; however, these individuals may act as consultants to the IRB
- VA Facility Directors, their administrative staff, Chief of Staff, other facility senior administrators such as Associate or Assistant Directors or Chief Nurse, and NPC Administrative Staff
The VA Privacy Officer and the Information Security Officer serve in an advisory capacity to the IRB as consultants.
IRB membership rosters are maintained which list IRB members identified by name, earned degrees, representative capacity, indications of experience such as board certifications, licenses, etc., sufficient to describe each member's primary anticipated contributions to each IRB deliberation, and any employment or other relationship between each member and the institution (e.g., full time employee, member of governing panel or board, paid or unpaid consultant).
For alternates, the roster identifies by name the primary member(s) for whom each alternate member may substitute. Alternates must have qualifications similar to the member they replace.
IRB membership information reported to the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) is updated within 90 days after changes to an IRB chairperson or the contact person who provided the IRB registration information.
The Vice President for Research or his/her designee appoints IRB members, Chairs, and Vice Chairs, in writing, based on recommendations from IU department chairs and following a careful review of candidate qualifications to ensure adequate representation. IRB members may be appointed for terms of up to three years, and may be reappointed for an unlimited number of terms. At the time of appointment and at reappointment, as requested, IRB members are required to:
- read the Belmont Report
- complete the required IRB member modules of the Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) course
- review the IRB Member Education website
- disclose potential conflicts of interest.
IRB members cannot serve as voting members until these requirements are met.
A reasonable number of alternates who may serve in place of absent members are also appointed. Alternates must also complete the appointment requirements listed above.
All IRB members and alternates are expected to fulfill the following responsibilities:
- Attend IRB meetings regularly
- Serve as primary reviewer for IRB submissions assigned to them
- Conduct an in-depth review of all materials
- Be prepared for discussion at the meeting, including presenting the submission to the IRB and making a recommendation regarding IRB action
- Be familiar with all other submissions included on the meeting agenda
- Be knowledgeable about the local research context in order to make appropriate determinations
- Be knowledgeable of the community from which the subjects are drawn to ensure the protection of subjects' rights and the appropriateness of the informed consent process
- As applicable, review the storage and control plans for investigational drugs and devices to ensure that they are used only in approved research and under the direction of approved investigators
- Review expedited submissions on an ad hoc basis
- Complete annual membership evaluation
- Disclose potential conflicts of interest
In addition, IRB Chairs and Vice Chairs are responsible for the following:
- Conduct IRB meetings, including:
- Call meetings to order
- Facilitate discussions
- Provide counsel to IRB members
- Call for motions and votes
- Adjourn meetings
- Work with Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) staff to coordinate resolution of compliance issues, including discussion and mediation with study teams
- Review and provide comments on requests for study suspensions
- Evaluate IRB members annually, in conjunction with HRPP staff
IRB members, including Chairs and Vice Chairs, are evaluated annually using the IRB Member Evaluation Form by the Associate Vice President for Research Compliance, in collaboration with the University Director of the HRPP. Feedback may be provided individually or in aggregate either electronically or in a meeting setting. Information from the evaluation is maintained by the HRPP. The Evaluation Tool addresses attendance, quality of reviews, contributions at IRB meetings, timeliness of reviews, and evidence of understanding of applicable regulations, policies, and procedures.
Concerns with any IRB member's performance are resolved in consultation with the IRB Chair or Vice Chair (when appropriate), department Chair, Associate Vice President for Research Compliance, and/or the IRB member directly, as appropriate. Potential outcomes can range from further education for the IRB member to removal from the IRB.
When IRB members are considered for reappointment, evaluations that occurred during their service on the IRB are considered along with input from members of the HRPP staff, IRB Chairs and/or Vice Chairs, and department Chairs.
4.0 - Sanctions
Individuals found to be in violation of this policy may be subject to sanctions relating to their participation in review of research with human subjects.
Back to top5.0 - History
Policy contact updated from HSO to HRPP. Removed reference to KC IRB in section 6.0.
Back to topForms and Templates
- IRB Member Information Sheet
- IRB Member Evaluation Form
Regulatory References
- AAHRPP Standards
- Standard I-1, Elements I.1.D, I.1.E
- Element I.4.C
- Element I.5.A
- Standard II-1, Elements II.1.A, II.1.B, II.1.C
- Element II.2.D
- 21 CFR 56, especially 56.107
- 45 CFR 46, especially 46.107 and Subpart E
- Memorandum of Understanding Between Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Indiana University Concerning Utilization of Indiana University’s Institutional Review Boards
- VHA Directive 1200.05 – Requirements for the Protection of Human Subjects in Research, especially section 7
7.0 - Definitions related to this policy
device, drug, human subject, institutional review board (IRB), investigational biologic/drug/device/test article, investigator, nonscientist, prisoner, research, suspension
View All Abbreviations and Definitions
Back to top