Recognizing Potential Research Misconduct
All members of the IU community are obligated to guard against and report potential research misconduct. Research misconduct includes falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism.
Falsification: manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record. Some examples of falsification may include:
- Reuse of images to represent different experimental conditions
- Image manipulation, such as cropping, flipping, resizing, recoloring, etc., such that the new image does not reflect the same properties as the original
- Alteration of eligibility dates, procedure dates, test results, or other research results, or omission of data to conform to a specific hypothesis
- Failure to fully disclose required information in proposals, including current positions and scientific appointments or affiliations, Current & Pending (Other) Support, and Collaborations & Affiliations. See https://research.iu.edu/news-events/announcements/2025-03-31-ora.html for more information regarding Collaborations & Affiliations disclosure. It is important to note that falsification can occur in any research record, which includes grant proposals, raw data, processed data, clinical research records, animal research records, laboratory records, study records, laboratory notebooks, progress reports, manuscripts, abstracts, theses, recordings of oral presentations, online content, lab meeting reports, and journal articles.
Fabrication: making up data or results and recording or reporting them. For example, creating documentation for experiments, visits, procedures, or interactions that did not occur.
Plagiarism: the appropriation of another person’s ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit. Cases of plagiarism may include reuse of another’s work without citation, or failure to credit all authors who made substantial contributions to a work that would otherwise have warranted authorship or acknowledgement. Plagiarism typically does not include authorship disputes such as complaints about appropriate ranking of co-authors.
If you observe or suspect falsification, fabrication, or plagiarism in research, please reach out to Research Integrity Office staff for a confidential consultation:
- Amy Waltz, Research Integrity Officer, acthurst@iu.edu
- Leslie Albers, Research Integrity Project Manager, lealbers@iu.edu
- Drew Mack, Research Integrity Project Manager, madmack@iu.edu
Allegations of potential research misconduct are addressed in accordance with the IU Policy on Research Misconduct (ACA-30). Recent revisions to federal regulations necessitate changes to ACA-30. The IU Research Integrity Office convened a working group to analyze the changes and is currently proposing revisions to ACA-30. If you have questions or comments about the regulations or ACA-30, please contact the IU Research Integrity Office at rio@iu.edu.