Accessibility disclaimer: To obtain information contained in document files on this page in an accessible format please contact the Office of the Vice Provost for Research for Bloomington by phone: (812) 855-3931 or email: firstname.lastname@example.org or the Office of the Vice Chancellor for IUPUI by phone: 317-274-1020 or email: email@example.com.
Emerging Areas of Research
Emerging Areas of Research Program (EAR)
About this opportunity
Rick Van Kooten,
Vice Provost for Research,firstname.lastname@example.org
Executive Director of Research Development,email@example.com
Up to $3 million per initiative, with between 1-3 faculty base salary lines per initiative. Funding lasts 4 years.
The Emerging Areas of Research funding program supports key areas of research or creative strength on the IU Bloomington campus that are novel or established, but are in need of support to increase the stature of the area at IU Bloomington and beyond. (Note: The EAR Program is separate, unique, and distinct from the IU Grand Challenges Program).
The EAR funding program supports investigators who are prepared to undertake a significant and complex investigation involving fresh approaches to research or creative activities. The area that is emerging should capitalize on existing strengths on campus and/or fill an existing gap in personnel that is critical to enhancing the volume, quality, impact and reputation of research at IU Bloomington and will lead to federal, corporate, or private funding. (Projects should have the potential for strong funding commensurate with their particular field or fields).
The first EAR award, made in early 2017, went to the Learning: Machines, Brains & Children initiative, led by Distinguished Professor of Psychological and Brain Sciences Linda Smith.Watch a video about IU Bloomington's first Emerging Areas of Research initiative
Two EAR awards were made in 2018, one to the Sustainable Food Systems initiative, led by James Farmer, of the School of Public Health-Bloomington, and the Center for Quantum Information Science and Engineering, led by Gerardo Ortiz, of the College of Arts and Sciences' Department of Physics.
Eligible as PIs:
All tenured and tenure-eligible faculty and center directors. Proposals including participation by women and members of underrepresented groups as PIs and team members are especially encouraged. There is no limit on the number of proposals on which faculty and research scientists may collaborate.
Eligible as team members but not as PIs or co-PIs:
- Medical Sciences faculty
- Clinical faculty
- Faculty appointments not eligible for tenure
- Emeritus faculty
- Visiting and adjunct faculty members
- Research and staff scientists/scholars
- Postdoctoral research associates
- Graduate students, as supervised by faculty team members
Proposal Preparation and Submission Requirements
A one-page Emerging Areas of Research Proposal Abstract form is required. The required proposal abstract has a maximum of 500 words and is due by June 2018. It should be emailed to firstname.lastname@example.org. Please include a broad description of the general issues of the planned EAR proposal, and if available, a brief outline of the research questions. For the full proposal, you will not be held to the exact research questions as sketched in the abstract.
A list of relevant abstracts will be sent to the relevant deans so the deans know the number and titles of possible EAR initiatives within their academic units. Because deans will need to provide a letter of support, faculty are urged to check that their dean and their associate dean for research are supportive of the potential area of research being submitted for EAR funding.
For the final proposal, applications must be submitted electronically through the Infoready system. A PI must log in to complete and submit the application. IU authentication is required.
Each proposal must include the components listed here. No other attachments are necessary or permitted.
- Proposal Cover Sheet: Generated by the online application system and completed by the PI.
- Personnel (two- page maximum): Upload PDF attachment to the application. List:
- The PI/Co-PIs and other project leaders for the proposed EAR initiative, and a brief statement on the expertise and value each will bring to the initiative.
- The other team members who have agreed to participate, including area of expertise, and percent effort to be contributed to the initiative.
- Biosketches (three-page maximum or standard NIH/NSF biosketch): Upload PDF attachment to the application. Provide biosketches for the PI/co-PIs and project leaders in NIH, NSF, or similar format. Biosketches are not counted in the cumulative word/page limit for the proposal, and must include a summary of current and past external funding.
- Research Plan (15-page maximum, not including references): A required Research Plan outline will be accessible at the online application site. Upload PDF attachment to the application. Proposals should be written so that a reviewer from any discipline can understand and evaluate it. For this reason, it is recommended that you not use detailed content from proposals submitted or intended for external agencies with the exception of basic introductory narrative. All sections must be included and labeled as they are outlined below:
- Introduction: Describe the area of research, and explicitly explain why this research is emerging. Include the current state of knowledge and expertise relevant to the proposed work, and explain how IU Bloomington will be unique in its pursuit of this area and would rank compared with other institutions involved in similar research. State the overall objective of the emerging research and state why, with additional resources, this proposed area can become novel or world-class.
- Specific Aims: Define the broad long-term objectives and the goals of specific projects under the emerging area of research proposed, e.g., to test a hypothesis, create a novel design, stage a performance or exhibit never considered before, solve a specific problem, challenge an existing paradigm, address a critical barrier to progress in the field, or develop new technology. Describe the specific aims that will contribute to achieving the long-term objectives and goals.
- Design and Methods: Describe the research design, conceptual or clinical framework, and procedures that will be used to accomplish the specific aims of the projects. Describe any new methodology and its advantage over existing methodologies. Describe any novel concepts, approaches, tools, or technologies that will be used. Describe the approach to be used for data analyses and interpretation.
- Timetable: Provide a proposed sequence of events and timetable for the four years of research of the overall initiative, as well as related projects.
- Significance and Impact: For each project within the EAR initiative, clearly state the importance and relevance of the proposed work within the represented fields and the larger world of ideas. Discuss any novel ideas or contributions that each project offers.
- Team Leadership and Collaboration: Describe the team’s collaboration management plan, i.e., approach to leadership and integrating each team member into the proposed emerging area of research. For example, how will team members contribute their expertise to address the research questions being investigated? How will information be shared, and how will the team interact to share progress and plan future goals?
- Future Funding/Sustainability: Provide a detailed explanation of how this area of research or creative activity could be sustained long-term, including the potential for, and likely sources of, external funding, appropriate to the discipline or field. Indicate potential for commercialization, if applicable. This section should address not only traditional sources of funding such as NSF and NIH, but other government agencies, corporate and private funders such as foundations, companies, and private philanthropic support. When applicable, include specific funding announcements and a timetable for submissions.
- New Positions Proposed: Justify why each new position is needed and its relation to current positions and how these positions serve the common interest of the schools/College. Think of this as a “gap analysis” explaining what IU Bloomington has and what is needed for the proposed EAR initiative to succeed.
- IU and External Collaborative Arrangements: Briefly describe the collaborations you propose and provide evidence that the collaborators will be engaged in the initiative. (See “Letters of Support” section.)
- Metrics and Deliverables: Include the metrics and deliverables for assessment, describing how progress and impact will be measured, as well as how enhancement of the reputation of IU Bloomington by the proposed initiative will be assessed.
A required budget template is accessible at the online application site. Upload PDF attachment to the application. Provide an initial four-year notional budget, which should include all projected expenditures. Acceptable expenses are determined by the nature of the initiative and relevant projects, and the justification. Those selected to receive funding will be expected to provide a full budget on an annual basis.
EAR funds must be expended on the IU Bloomington campus. Total EAR budgets should not exceed $3 million in cash. The base salaries of new faculty hires are not to be included in the $3M cash budget, but the budget must include half the estimated cost of startups for new faculty hires, as well as all other expenses. It is expected that not all new hires will be at a senior level.
The budget justification (five-page maximum) must provide a rationale for all salaries (excluding salaries for new faculty), materials, equipment, and travel funds requested, as well as any item whose purpose or cost computation is not self-evident.
Proposals requesting support for postdoctoral research associates or graduate students must outline a plan in the justification for how they will be appointed that is consistent with the anticipated start date, duration, and timeline for the EAR initiative.
For each proposed new faculty line, explain how the candidate will be a key contributor who will make the campus more competitive in attracting external funding and/or provide evidence that shows how his/her activity will enhance the reputation of IU Bloomington. Please do not include specific names or institution affiliations of possible new faculty hires, as EAR proposals will be made public.
- If selected, summer salary for 10-month faculty appointee as discussed with unit dean and chair
- If selected, course release funds as discussed with unit dean and chair
- Estimated start-up costs for new faculty
- Equipment purchases
- Travel to conferences and meetings with collaborators and partners unique to the proposal. Maximum $20,000/year (not including field work)
- Fees associated with using IU Bloomington facilities. Non-IU Bloomington facilities may be utilized only if no comparable facilities exist at IU Bloomington
- Development of seminars, colloquia, and engagement programs
- Sub-contracts and consultants are allowed with appropriate justification. For IU faculty or staff consultants, hourly compensation is limited to their direct rate (exclusive of fringe benefits). If the consultants are from outside IU, justification for their hourly rates must be provided.
- Postdocs/research scientists and graduate students are allowed with appropriate justification.
- A service contract for 1 year is allowed for equipment purchased as part of the EAR initiative.
Costs Not Allowed
- Full-year salary for any faculty academic appointee (including sabbatical leave)
- Service contracts for existing equipment beyond 1 year
- Collaborators are allowed from other IU campuses or institutions, but they may not receive any support from EAR funds. This includes summer salary, student or undergraduate salaries, and materials and supplies. Initiatives that include support for non-IU Bloomington participants will require appropriate cost sharing, since EAR funds may only be used to support IU Bloomington participants.
- Development of curricular programs for students.
Funds will not be released until any required IRB/IACUC/IBC approvals have been received.
A “no-cost extension” allowing funds to be carried over beyond year 4 requires a request with justification from the PI and a progress report. Extensions are limited to an additional 12 months unless there are exceptional circumstances. Requests must be approved by OVPR prior to the expiration of the EAR award.
Letters of support (with 2-page limit per letter) should be uploaded as an attachment to the application in one inclusive PDF document. Alternatively, they may be emailed or faxed. Allow ample time to discuss with your chairs and deans the strength of your proposed initiative and how it aligns with the unit’s strategic priorities or is a new strategic direction that merits support. The number of required letters depends on the number of academic programs/units involved. Required letters include:
- One letter from the chair of each academic program/unit that is affected by the initiative through involvement of the PI or co-PIs. If the chair is a co-PI, a letter must be provided by the associate chair or equivalent.
- One letter that OVPR will solicit from a list of outside experts provided by applicants and up to two additional letters from external reviewers not included on the submitted list.
- Concomitant letters that reflect IU and external collaborative arrangements. OVPR will solicit letters from the dean(s).
The first round of EAR reviews is conducted by discipline-specific review panels.
- Two review panels will be established as follows:
- One review panel with up to 8 tenured faculty will represent the physical and natural sciences. The Associate Vice Provost for the Sciences will chair the review panel.
- One review panel with up to 8 tenured faculty will represent the social sciences, humanities, and the arts. The Associate Vice Provost for the Arts and Humanities will chair the review panel.
- One primary and one secondary reviewer will be assigned to each proposal. Their responsibilities will include developing a written review to be shared with the review panel prior to a meeting where the primary reviewer will present the proposal to panel members for discussion.
- All proposals will be evaluated by all members of the review panel. Written comments are not required by those not assigned as a primary or secondary reviewer. The evaluation of each proposal will be based explicitly on the review criteria outlined as follows:
- Represents a complex, established or novel, and significant investigation (which may be either discipline-specific or multidisciplinary).
- Strategically addresses an area of existing strength at IU Bloomington for which a novel approach requiring the addition of resources will make the area world-class among peers or recognized for identifying and executing a novel approach.
- Represents a strong team-based approach to research and/or creative activity, and evaluates the scholarly strength of the team.
- Identifies an area where the campus can become more competitive with the addition of key faculty.
- Serves the broader goals of the schools/College with the addition of key faculty.
- Describes the feasibility of the proposed research or creative activity and the impact of the research or creative activity.
- Outlines well-defined, achievable goals that can be measured quantitatively and qualitatively.
- Strategically leverages IU Bloomington’s existing resources and potentially garnered resources outside of the IU community.
- Has potential to attract the external competitive, philanthropic, corporate, and/or government funding, as appropriate to the discipline or field that can sustain the area of research or creative activity. (Proposals in disciplines where commercialization possibility and external funding prospects are not directly relevant or feasible will not be judged on those factors.)
- Each review panel will meet to discuss each proposal and will determine a rank order used to eliminate approximately one-half of the proposals from advancing to the second-round review panel.
The second round of EAR reviews will be conducted by a multidisciplinary review panel.
- The second-round review panel will consist of 12 members, four of whom will be drawn from the two review panels in the first round of reviews and who will serve as consultants for responding to questions and providing clarification on proposals as needed.
- One primary and one secondary reviewer will be assigned to each proposal. Their responsibilities will include developing a written review to be shared with the review panel prior to a meeting where they will present the proposal for discussion with panel members.
- All proposals will be evaluated by all members of the review panel. Each reviewer receives an equal number of proposals to write a written review.
- The scores applied to each proposal will be based explicitly on the program goals outlined on pages 2-3 of the Emerging Areas of Research RFP and on recommendations and input from discipline-specific first-round review panels.
The top selected proposals will be reviewed as follows:
- The 12-member review panel will receive all materials before the initial meeting. In that meeting they will choose approximately five proposals to be presented to them by the PI and a few close collaborators. Each presentation will be scheduled for 1 hour: 30 minutes for presentation, 20-30 minutes for a question and answer session.
- Once all chosen proposals have presented, the 12-member review panel will meet one more time to discuss the top proposal(s) to recommend.
- Finalist proposals will be reviewed by the respective academic dean of the originating school or center as indicated by letter(s) of support from dean(s) (to be solicited by OVPR).
- The Vice Provost for Research will serve as an ex-officio chair of the review panel to address any questions throughout the process.
Reviews of all proposals will be provided to the Provost and to the Vice Provost for Research, who will make the final funding decision together. Following award decisions, OVPR will meet with each team (at their request) to review their proposal’s strengths and weaknesses.
Depending on the review panel’s assessment and score of a proposal, some proposals not selected for an award may be revised and resubmitted in the future, or considered for other types of institutional funding competitions.
- Successful applicants are required to notify OVPR upon submission or funding of external proposals derived from the funding received through the EAR program. Applicants should provide the IU proposal number.
- Successful applicants will be required to submit an annual progress report by January 1 of every year following the start of funding. This report must include a new budget for the upcoming fiscal year (July 1-June 30). Requested data for the progress report will include:
- Percentage of initiative completed
- Progress towards metrics and deliverables stated in the proposal
- Resulting hires
- Resulting publications, performances, conferences, exhibits—titles, dates, venues, bibliographic info, new research methodologies
- Impact of EAR award on applying for external funding—titles, agencies, date submitted (past and future), amounts requested, status, awarded amount
- Recognition—awards, honors, prizes, reviews
- Budget report outlining funds utilization and details on any expenditure(s) outside of the approved budget
- New fiscal year budget (July 1 – June 30)
- Successful applicants will be required to submit a full report no later than six months after the end of the award. Requested data will include:
- Summary of results during the course of the initiative and how they addressed the initial EAR goals.
- Success towards metrics and deliverables stated in the proposal
- Hiring goals and implementation
- Budget report outlining funds utilization and details on any expenditure(s) outside of the approved budget.
- Resulting publications, performances, conferences, exhibits—titles, dates, venues, bibliographic info, new research methodologies
- Progress in applying for external funding - titles, agencies, date submitted (past and future), amounts requested, status, awarded amount
- Recognition: awards, honors, prizes, reviews
- Additional follow-up information may be requested outside of the progress report, to determine the ongoing efficacy of the EAR
- Awardees will be required to present the outcomes of the EAR initiative at a special symposium planned by OVPR and held no more than one year after the end of the award.
All awards are subject to Indiana University's intellectual property guidelines
EAR awards must be acknowledged in any resulting publications, including press releases, using the following suggested language: "This initiative was funded [or partially funded] by IU Bloomington's Office of the Provost, the Office of the Vice Provost for Research, and [supporting academic unit/s] through the Emerging Areas of Research Funding Program."
An electronic copy of such publications should be submitted to email@example.com.